loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Which characteristic is shared by sonnets and haiku?
State whether the following statements are true or false. Justify.(i) For an arbitrary binary operation * on a set N,  a * a = a ,  for all a * N.(ii) If * is a
the length L of a spring is given by L=(3/4)F + 5 where F is applied force. What force F will produce a length of 8?
How do I solve for x? X+6x=56
graph y=3sinx and y=sin 3x on the same axes. label the graph of each function.
How is 3x-y=8 and x+2y=5 solved by combination (addition)?????
Is the E-CIG industry more "safe" than the actual tobacco companies? Why? If someone offered you E-CIGS than cigarettes would you say yes or no? Why?Full Paragr
the graph below shows the distribution of students grades on their last math test. Based on the Empirical rule, what percent of students made.. *btwn 80 n 85 o
How many hours are 180 minutes
What were the reasons for the failure of the League Nations?